also sprach Stéphane Glondu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.30.1019 +0200]: > > refs/top-tags/debian/1.0-1/base and > > refs/top-tags/debian/1.0-1/tip > > Doing it that way would pollute the tag namespace, IMO.
Yes and no. Normal tags are in refs/tags. I am proposing the refs/top-tags namespace, which is reserved for topgit anyway (topgit reserved refs/top-*). Sure, gitk and the like would still show those refs (as grey refs, not yellow tags or green branches), but git-tag wouldn't. > What about keeping this data in a dedicated, special branch, like > pristine-tar does? You want to keep files with SHA-1 refs in a branch? I am not sure I like that at all. First of all, this clearly seems like a feature for upstream, and second, Git is all about keeping track of refs, storing them as payload in a branch seems like patching patch files :) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems an avocado-tone refrigerator would look good on your resume.
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
