John Wright wrote: > Yes, lenny will have both python2.4 and python2.5. One workaround, at > least for the compiler.ast.From problem, would be to run destar with > #!/usr/bin/python2.4 instead of #!/usr/bin/python. But I think it > better to fix the bug rather than try to work around it, if possible. Definitely, my concern was for the backwards compatibility.
>> Are your fixes backwards compatible? It'd suck to fix this only to have >> a bug report the day after "fails to run with python2.4" :) > > I made sure the fix for #501207 was backwards-compatible. As for the > SyntaxError problem, I'm surprised it ever worked at all. Function > definitions with optional arguments before required positional arguments > aren't legal in 2.4 either (I'm not sure when/if they ever were). Maybe > quixote used to generate different actual Python code than it does now > in this case? Anyway, I'm pretty certain the patch for the SyntaxError > will work with python2.4, but I'll check tomorrow. Great, thanks a lot! Regards, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]