-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Steve,

Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Ah, that explains your difference. The +b1 release was a binNMU: a
> simple rebuild on i386 to work around a bug that looked to be a simple
> compiler-related issue in the package. If you're on non-i386 and are
> seeing a similar problem then that's more of an issue. :-( Which arch
> are you using, and would you be able to try building the new 1.1.9-1
> package that I've just uploaded?

Just done. Took a while to build and create a new image. The problem
does not exist with the new package, so it looks as though 1.1.9-1 will
nail this bug on amd64.

> Thanks for your patience,

Thank you for all your work and for uploading the fix!

CT.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkFBf0ACgkQ0SwfPjLnaZYrZQCfSd3Z2j7V+Kllvw5sDKIbYRU2
XWoAn3EpK1ccNslbkBsj9wU3jTqayLTV
=ob/l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to