Hi, 2008/10/27 Deng Xiyue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:27:45AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: >> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> > Quoting Kobayashi Noritada ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> > > Package: aptitude >> > > Version: 0.4.11.10-1lenny1.1 >> > > Severity: normal >> > > >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > aptitude 0.4.11.10-1lenny1.1 uploaded to testing-proposed-updates >> > > depends on libept0 (>=0.5.26), but testing (lenny) currently ships >> > > libept0 0.5.22, making aptitude uninstallable: >> > >> > >> > OK, my mistake. I built it in a sid chroot...:-( >> > >> > So, RM, you should not allow aptitude from t-p-u to enter >> > testing. Failed attempt of mine....:-( >> >> >> And, sorry for this, but I won't have time in the next days to do >> another attempt.... >> >> > > IMHO scheduling a binNMU should be enough to handle this.
I think so after checking the source package. Is it possible to do binNMU for testing-proposed-updates against testing? I have checked http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU. Is a following line enough for the request? aptitude_0.4.11.10-1lenny1.1, Rebuild against testing fixes #503634, 1, i386 Thanks, -nori -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
