Package: pdfjam Version: 1.20-2 Followup-For: Bug #436256
For me the package works with texlive-latex-recommended (about 30MB w/o recommends). The fonts should never be needed unless you add text which afaik pdfjam does not. Processing documents for which fonts are not included in the pdf might cause problems but then it is a problem of the document author, not the tools. Also there is no guarentee the missing font would be among the TeX fonts. At most the fonts could be suggested to easily process TeX documents broken in this way. Also, please, somebody check that installing the fonts hepls in any cases at all. Thanks Michal -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages pdfjam depends on: ii texlive-latex-recommended 2007.dfsg.1-4 TeX Live: LaTeX recommended packag pdfjam recommends no packages. pdfjam suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
