On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 16:17 +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 02:27:50PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > > This looks ok. What about > > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/d2657188377b which > > fixes the other issue? > > I wasn't quite so confident about applying that straight away; I did > intend to talk to upstream about its applicability to the 1.0 series but > never got around to it. > > Timo, do you have any comments about whether the above changeset could > be applied easily to dovecot 1.0? I've already applied > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/2dc3a5678fe5 > for the Debian packages.
Other distros' people have also asked me about that, but I haven't bothered even trying to see how difficult it would be to backport to v1.0. Maybe see if it's already been done in suse/redhat :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
