Hi Bug Filler, Kt, 2008 11 06 23:30 +0800, Bug Filler rašė: > Package: python-fontforge > Version: 0.0.20080927-1
Debian still hasn't the version such as that. So, we can't neither to answer something reasonable nor to fix this bug. I know only one place where you can find such package (on my personal repository at http://kebil.ghost.lt/debian/pool/fontforge/ ), but this package is still unofficial and main thing is -- hasn't this bug. > I think it's explained by this fontforge revision comment: > Revision 1.2945 - (download) > Sun Nov 2 03:20:50 2008 UTC (4 days, 12 hours ago) by pfaedit > Branch: MAIN > Changes since 1.2944: +2 -2 lines But this change was made 4 days ago, while the fontforge_full-20080927.tar.bz2 was realized one and a half month ago. > Distributions no longer provide .so files -- unless you ask for -dev > packages, and sometimes those don't exist. This means that dlopening a > library doesn't work. I think that's really stupid on the > distibutioner's part. What do they gain by removing the .so file? But > I won't even try to change their minds. Instead try to open the > appropriate foo.so.? file if we can't find foo.so (Not always, but in > the more important cases). Yes, on debian is usual to avoid dlopening. We use an option --with-regular-link instead. > So either python-fontforge depends on libfontforge or somehow move .so > files to libfontforge1 or add the patch. The dependency on libfontforge1 is enough. Best wishes, -- Kęstutis Biliūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kebil.ghost.lt | GnuPG-Key ID: F6E7A452
signature.asc
Description: Ši laiško dalis yra pasirašyta skaitmeniniu būdu
