# justification: makes the packages unusable severity 485233 serious clone 485233 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 reassign 485233 sugar-calculate-activity reassign -1 sugar-chat-activity reassign -2 sugar-journal-activity reassign -3 sugar-pippy-activity reassign -4 sugar-sharingtest-activity reassign -5 sugar-web-activity retitle 485233 activity is installed in the wrong place and thus not found retitle -1 activity is installed in the wrong place and thus not found retitle -2 activity is installed in the wrong place and thus not found retitle -3 activity is installed in the wrong place and thus not found retitle -4 activity is installed in the wrong place and thus not found retitle -5 activity is installed in the wrong place and thus not found tags 485233 +patch tags -1 +patch tags -2 +patch tags -3 +patch tags -4 +patch tags -5 +patch thanks
Hi, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485233#20 should have made 485233 serious already... On Saturday 29 November 2008 19:22, Luke Faraone wrote: > > Is it a packaging fix for 0.81 or 0.82? > It was a packaging fix to the latest version of the activities in lenny, no > other changes have been made. I'm not sure how this corresponds to Sugar's > version scheme. Ok, so we can easily apply it to the 0.81 packages via t-p-u if the release team decides thats the proper route to take. (And whatever route we have to take, I'm happy to do prepare the necessary uploads.) http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-calculate-activity.git;a=commitdiff;h=77290bbd596bdb4dd9b76196f09586a1cd492172 shows the needed fix. Though, (as I already wrote) I'm wondering whether it makes any sense to have 0.81 in lenny at all. I'll ask the releaseteam what they think about 0.82 in Lenny shortly. If they decline that, we can still decide if its better to remove 0.81 then. regards, Holger
pgpxBPNwAzhOS.pgp
Description: PGP signature