On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 04:15:58PM +0100, Jelle de Jong wrote: > The geda package should not depend on the geda-doc package the geda package > should be > able to run fine with only the geda package, please move the geda-doc package > to > suggests or recommnds.
The geda package is only a meta-package used to depend on gschem etc. If you don't want geda-doc then you can install geda-gschem etc directly; there's no requirement to install the geda package. > Is it also possible to package the latest release :-p or provide an git > package, > this is because geda is in heavy development and with almost every report of > an > issue on the mailinglist the developers tell the user to manually build the > latest > git. Would be nice if a git package is provided during the heavy development > cycles > of the geda and pcb tools. The latest release will be packaged asap. I don't think it's likely that we will provide a git package; it's too labour intensive to keep it up to date. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
