Hi, On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 11:03:30 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Package: inetutils-inetd > Version: 2:1.5.dfsg.1-8 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: incorrect-provides > > The inetutils-inetd init.d script provide the same facility as > openbsd-inetd, and this give problems enabling dependency based boot > sequencing when switching inetd. Having several script providing the > same facility should be avoided, and virtual facilities should be used > instead. > > Please change the provide header in /etc/init.d/inetutils-inetd to > provide 'inetutils-inetd'. I am not aware of any other init.d scripts > depending on 'inetd', but please let me know if you are aware of any > such script. If such exist, it should be changed to depend on a > virtual facility or the individual inetd implementations.
Hmm, thinking about this, I guess it does not make much sense to provide a virtual $inetd, as the services depending on it being started are the ones which will be under inetd control anyway and thus not run from the init system. > Here is a patch. Thanks! I'll probably upload a new version targetting etch with this one. > diff -ur inetutils-1.5.dfsg.1/debian/inetutils-inetd.init > inetutils-1.5.dfsg.1-pere/debian/inetutils-inetd.init > --- inetutils-1.5.dfsg.1/debian/inetutils-inetd.init 2008-11-28 > 11:01:09.000000000 +0100 > +++ inetutils-1.5.dfsg.1-pere/debian/inetutils-inetd.init 2008-11-28 > 11:01:24.752662153 +0100 > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > #! /bin/sh > ### BEGIN INIT INFO > -# Provides: inetd > +# Provides: inetutils-inetd > # Required-Start: $local_fs $remote_fs > # Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs > # Should-Start: $syslog regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
