On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:26:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:56:07AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> 
> > Shouldn't this bug be reassigned to gcc-??? instead of being closed?
> 
> Uh, if you like.  It struck me as a waste of time - from what Steve said
> the GCC maintainers are already aware and this would just create noise
> for them.

OK, nevermind then.

-- 
Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to