On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:26:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:56:07AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > > Shouldn't this bug be reassigned to gcc-??? instead of being closed? > > Uh, if you like. It struck me as a waste of time - from what Steve said > the GCC maintainers are already aware and this would just create noise > for them.
OK, nevermind then. -- Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature