On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Steve King wrote:
> So, it seems I have provoked another, separate problem.
> But I can confirm that pi with values > 646456614 causes the floating
> point overflow I originally reported.
>
> I will keep looking for pi's failure value.

Thanks a lot!

 -richy.
-- 
  .''`.  Richard B. Kreckel
 : :' :  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 `. `'   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   `-    <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to