On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Steve King wrote: > So, it seems I have provoked another, separate problem. > But I can confirm that pi with values > 646456614 causes the floating > point overflow I originally reported. > > I will keep looking for pi's failure value.
Thanks a lot! -richy. -- .''`. Richard B. Kreckel : :' : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `- <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]