also sprach Simon Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.12.10.1501 +0100]: > I think, in my case, the problem is that the "tentative" flag is > set on that address. I have no idea how that happened, but adding > new addresses to the same interface doesn't set the tentative > flag and doesn't see the error on bind().
How did you add the address to the iface in the first place? Is there anything in dmesg? Could it be that another iface has the same address, even on another host? > Are you seeing that too? No. > I'm out beyond my IPv6 comfort zone here: Is it possible to take > this somewhere where IPv6 experts hang out? I am trying... anyway, it's not the tentative flag, that should really not influence the problem at hand, I think. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems i'd rather be riding a high speed tractor with a beer on my lap, and a six pack of girls next to me.
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
