Em Qua, 2008-12-17 às 13:22 +0100, Bastian Venthur escreveu: > Hi, > > just a quick question. Are the debianbts-python bindings supposed to go > into an extra package, will we reuse python-debianbts or is it supposed > to go into python-debian? Depending on the answer we can open or use the > appropriate mailinglist.
I'm open to suggestions there, but I believe it can be integrated on python-debian. If no one objects, I think the right place for the technical discussion would be the pkg-python-debian-discuss ml. > Anyways to make a start the discussion, here's what debianbts uses as > datastructure for a single bugreport. It fits the needs of reportbug-ng > so far, but maybe not others. Feel free to discuss: The current bug class of btsutils tries to separate the usertags in a separete field from the tags. It also has a forwarded field, which kept the URL the bug was forwarded to (or whatever the maintainer set on forwarded) and an url field, which I don't remember why I had added, as it is easy and inexpensive to compute on-the-fly with the bug number... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org