On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:38:34AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Well, that would reall mean that upstream should rather change the > semantics of --preserve-dup-deps, no?
I do not know. > What keeps you from using -Wl,-lname? It requires gcc, can't be pointed at .la files, and would mean setting a bunch of -L paths? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
