On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 04:55:40PM +0200, Miernik wrote: > On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 04:36:55PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > I am reluctant to try a kernel that old on my personal notebook. I > > have broadband again now, and do not use the UMTS card that often any > > more. > > r...@debian106:~# ifconfig ppp0 > ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol > inet addr:10.243.69.180 P-t-P:10.64.64.64 Mask:255.255.255.255 > UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:923 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:1040 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:3 > RX bytes:1136175 (1.0 MiB) TX bytes:73000 (71.2 KiB) > > r...@debian106:~# ping 212.2.96.31 > PING 212.2.96.31 (212.2.96.31) 56(84) bytes of data. > ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available > ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available > ping: sendmsg: No buffer space available > > --- 212.2.96.31 ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 21078ms > > r...@debian106:~# uname -a > Linux debian106 2.6.15.7 #4 Sat Jun 9 11:40:51 CEST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux > r...@debian106:~# > > Damn :-(
Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org