On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 17:55:36 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 05:29:16PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Has the GNU triplet been accepted upstream? > > No, and won't be for some time. Their current policy is to require that a > fully functional system is available first.
Ah, right, I remember now. > In the unlikely situation that the GNU triplet had to be changed out of a > requirement from upstream, I think this shouldn't affect the dpkg triplet, > so it would be safe to start using it, even if this means GNU triplet and > dpkg triplet will end up being different. > > After all, this happened for "x86_64" vs "amd64" too. Yes I don't think that'd be a problem. One last question and then I think I'll be satisfied. Is the opensolaris project a complete fork from solaris? Just to make sure it makes sense to use kopensolaris instead of ksolaris, but I guess the kernel's uname output might be the definitive answer to that. thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
