At Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:40:05 +0100 (CET),
Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > What's the status of this bugreport?
> > Are we waiting for a better patch or is it held back by something?
>
> AFAIK, the patch is neither approved or blessed by upstream, and I
> personally do not like it because it introduces new features not
> guaranteed to be present on the next official version.
>
> I know that they are working on unzip version 6.0. Does the patch
> apply cleanly to the latest beta for unzip 6.0?
>
> If so, I could try to remind them about this.
>
Hmm...
In 6.0d, I see some code about wide-char support and Unicode (UTF-8)
experimental support, so I guess someone is trying to get something
in.
Quoting suspicious lines from ./History.600:
- zipinfo.c: added support for "UTF-8 path" extra field display to zi_long().
[Chr. Spieler]
- unzip.h: enable H_flag and U_flag for UNIX, VMS, WIN32 (those systems that
are currently supposed to support UTF8 names); unzip.h must not depend on
internal configuration settings like UNICODE_SUPPORT. [Chr. Spieler]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
