On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 at 21:01:12 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Does that mean that I should not simply upload a fixed release to > unstable, but wait and depend on that newer release of dbus? > > Or (looking at the changelog entry now) does it perhaps mean that my > change will work both now and (hopefully) with your new release of dbus, > but that my old sugar version will _not_ work with newer dbus?
I've tested lenny's sugar package with the D-Bus that's targeting lenny,
and it does work, so this bug obviously isn't particularly critical (in
particular, this bug doesn't block #503532 and is hence not RC for lenny).
I believe that all four combinations of (buggy, fixed) sugar and
(old, new) D-Bus should work in practice, so you shouldn't need to
introduce any versioned dependencies.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
