Am Donnerstag, den 29.05.2008, 20:34 -0700 schrieb Daniel Burrows: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 04:50:08PM +0200, Daniel Leidert > <daniel.leid...@wgdd.de> was heard to say: > > Am Donnerstag, den 29.05.2008, 07:18 -0700 schrieb Daniel Burrows: > > > If I run xmllint on the source, it spits the source back at me. Ah, I > > > need to pass "--nooout", in which case it tells me it doesn't like the > > > and λ entities. > > > > You should check with --nnout --valid (or --xinclude --postvalid, if > > there are xincludes). > > > > So did you stumble over a bug or were your documents buggy (not > > well-formed)? > > I don't know. :-) When I run "xmllint --noout --valid" on > aptitude.xml, I get no complaints. Can I assume that means it's > well-formed?
Sorry, I forgot to answer this. xmllint tests on well-formedness by default. With --valid it further tests, that it is valid against a DTD. However, xmlto performs: xmllint --noout --xinclude --postvalid ... (forget about the --xinclude switch) and this fails in this case. I found this statement by the upstream author of xsltproc: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2004-December/msg00062.html I will add the --noent switch in xmltos xmllint call to resolve this issue. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org