On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:29:03AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Are you sure you're looking at sarge's xterm?

Positive:

583 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/branden/packages/CHROOTS# dpkg -l xterm
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                                                        Version         
                                            Description
+++-===========================================================-===========================================================-======================================================================================================================================
ii  xterm                                                       4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 
                                            X terminal emulator
584 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/branden/packages/CHROOTS# debsums xterm
/usr/X11R6/bin/koi8rxterm                                                     OK
/usr/X11R6/bin/lxterm                                                         OK
/usr/X11R6/bin/uxterm                                                         OK
/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm                                                          OK
/usr/X11R6/man/man1/lxterm.1x.gz                                              OK
/usr/X11R6/man/man1/uxterm.1x.gz                                              OK
/usr/X11R6/man/man1/xterm.1x.gz                                               OK
/usr/X11R6/man/man1/koi8rxterm.1x.gz                                          OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.log.html                                           OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.faq.html                                           OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.faq.gz                                             OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/changelog.Debian.gz                                      OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/README.Debian                                            OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/copyright                                                OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/NEWS.Debian.gz                                           OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/README.i18n.gz                                           OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.termcap.gz                                         OK
/usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.terminfo.gz                                        OK
/usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq                                                 OK
/usr/lib/menu/xterm                                                           OK

> I know the terminfo was upgraded, and I wouldn't be surprised by a
> version dependence on xterm, but I thought it was around #192.

We ship XTerm #200 in xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14:

xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-14) unstable; urgency=high
[...]
xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-11) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
  * Update XTerm to patch #200 (2005-02-06) from Thomas Dickey's website.
    + Make active-icon work properly when TrueType fonts are used.
      (Closes: #286068)
    + Fix a regression from patch #197 which disowned the selection if it was
      scrolled, e.g., by the user pressing return at the bottom of the screen.
      (Closes: #277832, #291787)
    Resync patches #059, #803, and #907.
[...]
 -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:14:27 -0500

> The terminfo we're shipping is the same as the one in
> /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.terminfo.gz in 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14.  And that's in
> sarge.

I'm sorry, but I must differ with you there:

589 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zcat /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.terminfo.gz | 
md5sum
149359a0e57bff4d33bc74549812286f  -
590 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/terminfo/x/xterm | md5sum
a27bce1c0ad7de297b3fd0fad07ee3b6  -
591 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg -s ncurses-base | grep Version:
Version: 5.4-4
592 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude install ncurses-base

[...]

593 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg -s ncurses-base | grep Version:
Version: 5.4-7
594 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/terminfo/x/xterm | md5sum
af0d2fb61150c831b9adb5579c5b4286  -
595 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zcat /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.terminfo.gz 
>/tmp/xterm.terminfo-from-XTerm-200
596 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# diff -u /etc/terminfo/x/xterm 
/tmp/xterm.terminfo-from-XTerm-200
Binary files /etc/terminfo/x/xterm and /tmp/xterm.terminfo-from-XTerm-200 differ

Hmm, that's not too useful.

Uh, now I'm starting to get confused:

603 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# infocmp -F /etc/terminfo/x/xterm 
/tmp/xterm.terminfo-from-XTerm-200
"/etc/terminfo/x/xterm", line 1, col 1: Illegal character (expected 
alphanumeric or @%&*!#) - '^Z'
In file 1 (/etc/terminfo/x/xterm) only:
In file 2 (/tmp/xterm.terminfo-from-XTerm-200) only:
        xterm-new
        xterm+pcfkeys
        xterm-basic
        xterm-debian
        xterm-vt220
        xterm-vt52
        xterm-sun
        xterm-hp
        xterm-sco
        xterm-24
        xterm-65
        xterm-bold
        xterm-boldso
        xterm-mono
        xterm-noapp
        xterm-color
        xterm-ic
        xterm-xmc
        xterm-rep
        xterm-nrc
        xterm-16color
        xterm-256color
        xterm-88color
        xterm-8bit
        xterm-r6
        xterm-r5
        xterm-xfree86
        xterm
The following entries are equivalent:
Differing entries:
604 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# file /etc/terminfo/x/xterm
/etc/terminfo/x/xterm: RISC OS archive (spark format)

Eh?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    It was a typical net.exercise -- a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    screaming mob pounding on a greasy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |    spot on the pavement, where used to
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    lie the carcass of a dead horse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to