Matthias Andree, le Mon 02 Feb 2009 23:37:04 +0100, a écrit : > Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 23:19 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > > Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 14:34:54 +0100, a écrit : > > > * Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> [2009-02-01 14:28]: > > > > Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > Thanks I saw this one when searching for the problem after > > > > > receiving the bug report. But it's missing replies ;-P > > > > > > > > I'm wondering: maybe the issue is because the _server_ sends some URG > > > > data? > > > > > > Might be. Can you check this with tcpdump? > > > > Nothing in tcpdump. That may be a bug in glibc or Linux itself, I've > > only noticed these messages recently. > > Hm. Was this with IMAP perhaps?
I have various servers, POP, IMAP and IMAPs ones. I don't know their versions & co. > It might flag IMAP server ALERT messages as "urgent" in TCP Well, as said above I don't get URG packets in tcpdump. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
