Quoting Dan McCombs (dmcco...@dyndns.com): > that Debian-based distributions that pull their packages from unstable > or testing will receive the updated package sometime in the > not-so-distant future.
I think this is very likely to be Torsten's intent: as soon as lenny is released... > > Let me know if there's anything else I should do in the meantime to ease > the acceptance of the patch when it's possible. Leaving the "code" part aside, I think that the new debconf templates should also be reviewed in debian-l10n-english to avoid introducing new templates that are not comparable in style with the commonly accepted wording for debconf templates. I did not go in details in your proposal (and, anyway, even though I coordinate such reviews, I need the help of other debian-l10n-english subscribers who *are* native speakers and even sometimes experts in English language while I am neither of those...:-).....however, I would still point the "(Recommended)" parts in the templates synopsis that are not inline with that commonly accepted style. I'll followup on your initial bug report, CC'ing debian-l10n-english...so that we can prepare all this.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
