> Is it really necessary to make grass dependent on xterm? I used > to use grass 5 in konsole and I was pretty happy with that. > Wouldn't it be better to make it dependent just on > x-terminal-emulator?
"xterm" is hardcoded. Mostly invoked from the d.m GUI, display/d.m/script/d.colors.sh display/d.m/script/d.text.sh display/d.m/script/r.colors.rules display/d.m/script/r.reclass.rules display/d.m/script/r.recode.rules display/d.m/d.m.tcl lib/external/bwidget/entry.tcl lib/init/epsg_option.tcl scripts/r.mapcalculator/r.mapcalculator scripts/r3.mapcalculator/r3.mapcalculator It would be nice to get rid of all these, but we need a better interactive TCL solution first. These are all installed text files that you can hack away at if you really want to change xterm -> whatever. Does something providing x-terminal-emulator make a symlink called "xterm" and respect things like -e and -name? GRASS from the command line doesn't need xterm. It runs in whatever you start it in. Hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]