* John W. Eaton <j...@octave.org> [2009-02-13 15:25]: > On 13-Feb-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > | * John W. Eaton <j...@octave.org> [2009-02-13 13:06]: > | > | > The option --no-history is supposed to mean no history at all. What I > | > see is that the history file is not read, and commands are not saved > | > to the history list, but then the history (an empty list) is still > | > saved to the history file when Octave exits, wiping out whatever was > | > there before. > | > | I see that this bug affects the 3.1 branch. It seems that it is not the > | case for the 3.0 branch. Could you please confirm? > > What I see with 3.0.3 is that it reads and writes the history file > even with --no-history. So that is still wrong, but doesn't have the > bad effect of truncating the history file as happens with the 3.1.x > sources prior to the patch I checked in earlier today.
Thanks. I have already committed a change to the octave3.0 package in SVN that fixes the both reading and saving history problems. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org