severity 456131 serious
thanks
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:03:51AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>
>> On behalf of the QA group, I have been looking at packages which are
>> blocking the removal of libraries currently in the section oldlibs,
>> and paul is one of them, depending on imlib. With the aim
>> of fixing as many of the depending as possible to pave the way for
>> gradual removal of imlib, I would request you to consider
>> moving to imlib2.
>
> As far as I know there is no easy upgrade path from imlib to
> imlib2 (please correct me if I'm wrong). Because this would require
> massive code changes and testing for a so far working program I
> see no reason for a bug of severity "normal" and would like to
> decrease severity to "wishlist". Patches are very welcome but
> I'm currently working on more pressing things than this. If
> removal of imlib1 would be a release goal I would rather think
> about removal of paul than invest the needed amount of time into
> a low popcon package.
imlib1 is scheduled for removal, please adapt paul to imlib2 or
request it's removal from the archive.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
