> I would not recommend to try this to others. ;-)
Point taken. Gee! That (checking in) was fast for a single dosage of pestering
;)
Thanks for checking in the control files. I have received a mail telling that
the ITP bug is now tagged 'pending'. Also a mail on artha_0.8.0-1_i386 which
says
(new) artha_0.8.0-1.diff.gz optional utils
(new) artha_0.8.0-1.dsc optional utils
(new) artha_0.8.0-1_i386.deb optional utils
and in the end "Your package contains new components which requires manual
editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have
gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already
exist in other distributions."
So what does these mean? What file is it talking about? Also, if I had received
one for i386, why didn't I receive one for amd64? I am confused :-|
I wanted to understand the underlying process.
Thanks
Best Regards
Sundaram
________________________________
From: Andreas Tille <til...@rki.de>
To: Sundaram <legend...@yahoo.com>
Cc: Artha DebianBug <514...@bugs.debian.org>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 12:26:16 AM
Subject: Re: Regarding RFS: Artha
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Sundaram wrote:
> Wow! Never knew you would recommend pestering :0
SUre - but I have only the right to advise this for one
single person (=me). I would not recommend to try this to
others. ;-)
> I am perfectly fine by the usage of cdbs, as you told earlier that its
> convenient for
> you to keep track.
> Well I will remind (pester) you again tomorrow night, as a precursor to the
> weekend's
> :)
Before you pester again:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-science/packages/artha/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0
;-)
I also try to do the upload tomorrow ...
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- http://fam-tille.de
