On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:52, Vianney Lejeune <via....@free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the report and sorry for the delay in replying.  Do you
>> always experience any similar slowdown as the OP described near the same
>> time this message is printed ?  Are you both handling the same multiple
>> requests at the same time ?  Is it easy to reproduce, and if so is there
>> any anomalous mapping (present or absent) afterwards ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Nick
>
>>
>
> Hi,
>
>        The problem is I use upnpd on a gateway (250 computers). Various
> softwares use upnp, so I don't know if there are multiple requests as the
> same time, neither slowdowns. It happens sometimes according to the joined
> logfile.
> I can conduct some tests if you want to, provided I can get the tools.
>
> Regards,
> Mr Lejeune

My setup is rather similar.  A gateway for 100 home and business
computers running all kinds of different software.

When I reported the bug, my gateway would run fine for maybe a week,
before becoming very unresponsive.  A reboot would then help.  I gave
up on running upnpd, and the problem disappeared.

I am still not quite certain what actually happened.  My guess is that
upnpd caused 100% cpu use, starving the other running processes.  My
machine is an otherwise lightly loaded 500 MHz box.  But even if my
guess is correct, I cannot say whether the slowdown is related to this
error message.  I just seized on the error message as something more
tangible than the slowdown.

As you can probably guess, this is not easy to reproduce for me.  I
cannot leave the gateway running in a likely-to-break configuration
for weeks at a time.


Rune



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to