On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote: > To get aspell-nl properly registred, I did the following: > > 1) extract the file idutch from package idutch, found under > /var/lib/dictionaries-common/ispell > 2) copied it as /var/lib/dictionnaries-common/aspell/aspell-nl > 3) ran /usr/sbin/update-dictcommon-aspell > > So, what's missing: > - the proper dictionnary definition aspell-nl > - postinst and postrm scripts which update the aspell dict list >
Thanks for taking a look at this. You are right in the steps, but is better to add this in aspell-nl package directly. dutch dicts are currently orphaned, http://bugs.debian.org/314839 I already mailed the two interested persons about patches I had nearly ready for dutch dicts, one will deal only with registration and the other will also deal with affix compression (available for aspell 0.60). This second revealed some possible inconsistencies in the wordlist that might be of interest upstream. I am cc'ing these two persons now. I will reassign this bugreport to aspell-nl as soon as it has a new maintainer, I do not want to put noise on QA people in the meantime. If nodoby finally takes the package I will take it temporarily until finds a better (dutch speaking) home. Since seems I already have a working package, I have put dutch dicts at http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org/testing/ including both changes. Comments are welcome. A signed changes file is at the sources subdir. Thomas and Kurt: If you want I can upload the modified dutch package (of course with a correct version) or make the QA work for it until one of you takes it. Cheers, -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
