On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:32:51AM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > BTW "mta" is IMHO wrong. In most of the cases (IIRC) programs needs > only a "sendmail" program. Should we split the dependencies on real-mta and > only on a sendmail provider. > > BTW we should also rule a minimal set of sendmail interface (which option > should > be implemented). Actually every "MTA" has different sets of sendmail > options, > but I don't yet know about problems.
Well there were some problems with popularity-contest, see bug #326593 IIRC for sending to both f...@example.com and b...@example.com: ssmtp allows sendmail -oi f...@example.com,b...@example.com but not courrier-mta which want sendmail -oi f...@example.com b...@example.com Another issue for popularity-contest is that MTA that do not retry on error do not provide much avantage over HTTP submission. However popularity-contest does not need that the MTA listen on port 25. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
