On Sun, 01 Mar 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> They seem not really to be willing to give us moderation as
> requested in #514039 so I'll have to waste my time reporting
> backscatter, which is what they want. (I dont get why they dont
> listen to their users but instead ask them to suffer backscatter and
> do extra work, which causes work to them too. But anyway.)
I've already droped in rules to deal with this; the previous ones
hadn't taken effect due to a warning that I didn't catch.
> FYI: the last debian-edu irc meeting agreed that you did a good job
> on the last wave on backscatter and that we were fine without
> moderatiom for that moment (so we decided to leave 514039 as it is
> for now - but we also didnt close it). Now its on the agenda for the
> next irc meeting again. More wasted time which could be better spent
> with development issues.
It doesn't really matter to me what you folks decide, but since you
decided as a group not to do moderation, some how claiming that
listmaster@ is the nefarious party is rather disingenuous. It
certainly doesn't motivate this listmaster to have anything more to
deal with this issue. Best of luck.
Don Armstrong
--
a friend will help you move
a best friend will help you move bodies
but if you have to move your best friend's body
you're on your own
-- a softer world #242
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=242
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
