Philipp Kern wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >> Philipp Kern wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 03:06:14AM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: >>>> unetbootin is only supported on i386 and amd64. >>>> Therefore it should be in packages-arch-specific. >>> why is this the case? (I did not inspect the package itself.) You do not >>> name any reason in the changelog. Because the images created only boot >>> on i386 and amd64? You also allow installation of BSD but do not list >>> kfreebsd-* in your architectures list... >> Hello Philipp, because UNetbootin depends on syslinux, which is >> available only on i386 and amd64. Once it became available on some other >> (including kfreebsd-*) arches, I can add these arches too. > > Hm, could you just build-depend on it? That way it will be blocked on all > arches until syslinux becomes available. So, you suggest also build-depend on it and place 'any' in the Architecture field? If this won't introduce some problems with propagating to unstable (which was the reason to place arch restriction), I am fine to do this in next upload.
-- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Maintainer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
