Package: mono
Version: 2.0.1-5
Severity: minor
Hi!
I noticed some totally duplicated long descriptions in some of your
binary packages: mono-1.0-gac vs. mono-2.0-gac (even same synopsis),
mono-1.0-runtime vs. mono-2.0-runtime and libmono-getoptions1.0-cil vs.
libmono-getoptions2.0-cil (single character difference in synopsis).
libmono-data1.0-cil vs. libmono-data2.0-cil and libmono-posix1.0-cil vs.
libmono-posix2.0-cil at least have the 1.0 vs. 2.0 in its long
description too. ;)
libmono-getoptionsX.0-cil btw. does have 2.0 in the long description,
even in the 1.0 package.
Given from that minor differences I'm not sure what the user should
take as hint to which package install - just the one with the higher
number, or are they only depended on packages that are pulled in
automatically anyway? Still I guess a bit clearer differences between
the package descriptions might be helpful. If you disagree on that point
at least fix the bug in libmono-getoptions1.0-cil.
Thanks in advance!
Rhonda
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
