"Trent W. Buck" <trentb...@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > Firstly, what is the status of the ITP? Chris (part of the upstream > Koha team) told me in #koha that in Lenny the dependencies are all > resolved, so I guess that all that remains is to package Koha itself.
I've asked Chris Cormack about that on #koha just now. I thought we're still two short: Class::Adapter and SMS::Send. > How far along are you with that? There's the collab-maint tree that you're probably aware of. I'm currently testing a clean install at a client site. The thorny problems are the ones where the koha installation usually "interferes" with mysqld and wider system settings. > Secondly, I wanted to let you know that I'm available to help work on > this ITP. I am a DM. You can see my portfolio at the link below. As > yet, I don't have any experience with Perl packaging. > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=trentb...@gmail.com > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=scheme48 (recently O'd) Thanks. > I looked briefly at upstream yesterday, and it seems to me that at a > minimum you will want a -common package (due to the large amount of > architecture-independent data files) and as there are apparently 50MB > of translation files, possible also seperate koha-language-<ISO 639> > packages. Yes, I'd agree with that split as a minimum. I'm open to suggestions about whether we want libkoha-perl and koha packages split or not. Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray (slef). LMS developer and supporter for a small, friendly worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ (Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org