* Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> [20090318 13:29]: > Ben Poliakoff <b...@reed.edu> writes: > > > OK, interestingly I can successfully build the module for kernel version > > 2.6.28.x *without* using module-assistant. The following steps worked > > with both the openafs-1.4.8.dfsg1 source archive and with a checkout of > > openafs-stable-1_4_x: > > > > ./configure > > make only_libafs_tree > > cd libafs_tree > > make > > > > So is this a module-assistant bug? > > Did you run module-assistant clean immediately before trying the build > with module-assistant? This has bitten me before. Without clean, it just > unpacks the tarball over top of whatever happens to be there, which means > that you can end up with files left over from a previous build.
Thanks, you were right on target:
module-assistant clean openafs-modules
module-assistant a-b openafs-modules
worked flawlessly. Sorry for the false alarm, and thanks for the 'm-a
clean' tip.
I guess this bug can be closed.
Ben
--
________________________________________________________________________
PGP fingerprint: A131 F813 7A0F C5B7 E74D C972 9118 A94D 6AF5 2019
pgpOqJTBx1v3V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
