On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:14:38AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Gerfried Fuchs <rho...@deb.at> [2009-03-27 10:59:29 CET]: > > * Steve M. Robbins <st...@sumost.ca> [2009-03-23 20:57:49 CET]: > > > The script is used to create undecorated symlinks to libraries built > > > with the "default" python version. Right now the package builds > > > libraries for Python 2.4 and Python 2.5. I don't have libraries for > > > any other python version. One way I can handle "any python version" > > > is to simply not provide symlinks if Boost.Python doesn't have > > > libararies for the default version of python doesn't have. > > > > > > Once Python 2.6 is in sid, I'll update boost to build libraries for > > > it. > > > > ... so for the time being the boost (and all its dependencies) are > > blocked from transitioning to squeeze because of these bug reports. Is > > that really the intended behavior, how long is it expected to take to > > get solved for the good? > > Looked into it again - it only seems to affect boost1.37 badly. The > version it was reported for boost1.35 is only in experimental, and the > version it was reported for boost is already in testing. > > My suggestion is to reduce the severity for the bugreport against > boost1.37 for the time being so that it can transition to testing and > won't hold up other packages along that way until a proper solution has > been worked out.
Since you raised this, Rhonda, I have fixed the problem in all three versions and am in the process of building and uploading new packages. I should be done in a few hours. -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
