Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:17:09PM -0700]: > On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote: > > But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports > > both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1 > > still be needed ? > > As I said in my other mail, for transition reasons; > backward-compatibility is something many people like to *try* before > actually taking the leap.
Umh... For our users (yes, those following stable releases), do you want to provide an not-exactly-bleeding-edge-but-stable and one quite-old versions? Why? What's the gain? -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
