On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:02:05AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > In 2.6.27 through 2.6.29, it's > > int smp_call_function(void(*func)(void *info), void *info, int wait); > > > Perhaps I am looking at the wrong one. It could be some architectures > > use their own variant somehow. If so, changing the check to 2.6.27 > > instead of 2.6.29 should fix it. > > You mean like the following patch? > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > --- conftest.h~ 2009-04-13 07:43:50.000000000 +0200 > +++ conftest.h 2009-04-14 08:50:30.980322038 +0200 > @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ > /* Only kernels sometime before 2.4.0 don't have this function, and who */ > /* cares anymore */ > #define NV_SMP_CALL_FUNCTION_PRESENT > -#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,29) > +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,27) > #define NV_SMP_CALL_FUNCTION_ARGUMENT_COUNT 3 > #else > #define NV_SMP_CALL_FUNCTION_ARGUMENT_COUNT 4 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > That does indeed work for me. :-)
Yeah exactly. I am just still puzzled why looking at the sources from kernel.org it looks like 2.6.29 was the right point for the change. I will look at it again. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
