On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:13 +0200, Wolfram Quester wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:02:36PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:38 +0200, Wolfram Quester wrote: > > > > > there is another appearence of the same bug, but with another extension, > > > which was not captured by the last upload: > > > > > This won't be the same bug, but a different one; turning this into a new > > bug report. > Well, I think it is the same as #316470. > Bit of a silly thing to argue about ;) It's a different line of code, so a different bug, just a similar one... but, in fact:
> Yes, lintian inkscape_0.41-5.dsc works, but the output I sent was from a > new package I just built. You can download the new orig.tar.gz via > > wget > http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/inkscape/inkscape-0.41+0.42pre0.tar.gz > mv inkscape-0.41+0.42pre0.tar.gz inkscape_0.41+0.42pre0.orig.tar.gz > > .dsc and .diff.gz are appended to this mail. If I do > lintian inkscape_0.41+0.42pre0.dsc I get the aforementioned error. > Those are illegal filenames, diff.gz _MUST_ have a Debian revision. Therefore this isn't a bug (other than a confusing error message). Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
