Hi,
At Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:21:09 +0200,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:09:25AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I'm more inclined to make advi mandatory than allowing users to use
> > xdvi with whizzytex. Why would you want to use xdvi?
>
> Well, because I'm used to it and because it is the standard DVI viewer
> of TeXlive and TeTeX. Why should I install another DVI viewer when I
> already have one? Also, the current state of the advi package in
> Debian is sub-optimal, basically it is unmaintained (but is going to
> change, I hope).
whizzytex is really designed to work with advi (moving to the correct
page when editing, and allowing input via advi etc.). I think, using
xdvi is really suboptimal.
advi package not being actively maintained in Debian is a big problem,
but I'd like to keep advi the default.
regards,
junichi.
--
dan...@{netfort.gr.jp,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
