Hi, i don`t have any problem setup first or second solution, but i need decision from us.
Thanx Marek On Wednesday 29 April 2009 23:26:51 Simon Paillard wrote: > Marek, Matus, > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:22:29AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 07.04.09 22:15, Simon Paillard wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 March 2009 22:45:00 Simon Paillard wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:29:22AM +0100, Marek Zidek wrote: > > > > > Simon Paillard <simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr> > > > > > > > > > > > It seems you perform 2 syncs a day, but with times that implies 9 > > > > > > hours pass before an update on the primary server reach your own > > > > > > server (6 hours between ftp.debian.sk and you). > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to improve this (we now have 4 updates per day), the > > > > > > best method is to setup push mirroring. That means ftp.debian.sk > > > > > > may tell your mirror as soon as you can start the update, so > > > > > > that the 6 hours is reduced to the minumum value. > > [..] > > > So - I won't mind if *ynet.sk gets mirrorred from other site, if that > > won't cause any issues for debian mirrorring hierarchy. > > If debian.ynet.sk <-> ftp.debian.sk is fast enough, the best is to setup > the push, see http://debian.org/mirrors/push_mirroring > > On the other hand, too many mirrors using a tier-1 mirror may give too > much load. > > Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
