Jan Prunk wrote:
> I would just like to say, that I cannot produce this bug on another
> AMD_64 machine, where it works fine. The bug was produced on rented
> VPS server, so it could be that VPS specific issue. I can select other
> values fine there, like sort RES or SHR size.
> 
> Here is the "valgrind htop" output, which you wanted:
> 
> ==23679==    at 0x4C9DA2E: strcmp (mc_replace_strmem.c:337)
> ==23679==    by 0x8058CA4: (within /usr/bin/htop)
> ==23679==    by 0x804E3E5: (within /usr/bin/htop)
> ==23679==    by 0x6D7D774: (below main) (in /lib/libc-2.9.so)
> ==23679==  Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
> htop 0.8.1 aborted. Please report bug at http://htop.sf.net
> ==23679==
> ==23679== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 28 from 3)
> ==23679== malloc/free: in use at exit: 169,774 bytes in 645 blocks.
> ==23679== malloc/free: 3,703 allocs, 3,058 frees, 1,548,535 bytes allocated.
> ==23679== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
> ==23679== searching for pointers to 645 not-freed blocks.
> ==23679== checked 250,980 bytes.
> ==23679==
> ==23679== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==23679==    definitely lost: 156 bytes in 11 blocks.
> ==23679==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> ==23679==    still reachable: 169,618 bytes in 634 blocks.
> ==23679==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> ==23679== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Jan Prunk

Ok, so it's memory error. Will you mind If I ask you to rebuild the Debian
package with debugging symbols included to see full gdb backtrace? This would
require installing some additional development packages. If no, I will report
this issue as is to author.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Maintainer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to