On Sun, 10 May 2009 20:52:03 +0200
Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> wrote:

> Package: mono-gac
> Version: 2.0.1-6
> Severity: important
> 
> Hello Debian Mono Group,
> 
> There is a circular dependency between mono-2.0-gac,
> mono-2.0-runtime, mono-gac and mono-runtime:
> 
> mono-2.0-gac  :Depends: mono-runtime (>= 1.1.8.1)
> mono-2.0-runtime:Depends: mono-2.0-gac (= 2.0.1-6)
> mono-gac      :Depends: mono-2.0-gac (= 2.0.1-6)
> mono-runtime  :Depends: mono-2.0-runtime (= 2.0.1-6), mono-gac
> (= 2.0.1-6)

Upsy :-)

> 
> The dependency graph is available at 
> <http://debian.semistable.com/dot/mono-runtime_unstable.png>
> 
> Complex circular dependencies are known to cause problems during
> upgrade, so we should try to get rid of them.
> 
> Bug #365822 has been closed but actually the situation now is worse.

No it's not. This is just a regression caused by the Mono 2.0 [0]
transition. The mono-gac packages are not allowed to use the dh_clideps
to get dependencies. I simply forgot to exclude the 2 new packages
mono-1.0-gac and mono-2.0-gac. This will be fixed soonish.

> 
> I think you should arrange for a main package that depends on all the
> required components, instead of having each components depending on
> each others.
> 
> Cheers,

Thanks for reporting this!

[0] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMonoGroup/Mono20Transition

-- 
Regards,

Mirco 'meebey' Bauer

PGP-Key ID: 0xEEF946C8

FOSS Developer    mee...@meebey.net  http://www.meebey.net/
PEAR Developer    mee...@php.net     http://pear.php.net/
Debian Developer  mee...@debian.org  http://www.debian.org/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to