Hi Christian,

AFAICT, PETSc is finding make_new_seed_mpi, and deciding to build with
it, right?  Oh, but that's one of the very few mpi functions in there, I
see.

I'd be happy to disable sprng support in PETSc if it's causing problems.
Right now I'm chasing down another problem causing grave bug 529303 (and
possibly 529162 in a reverse-depend), so I will probably upload a new
version soon.

-Adam

On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 18:07 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> Dirk
> 
> I am not really interested (at the moment) but Petsc 3.0 in Debian is
> compiled with sprng support (I CC Adam Powell the maintainer of Petsc)
> but Petsc cannot find the proper MPI sprng routine.
> 
> Adam
> should we disable sprng support in Petsc ? with this Petsc 3.0 is
> still broken in Debian
> 
> Best regards
> C.
> 
> On Monday 18 May 2009 16:21:29 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On 18 May 2009 at 15:50, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> > | Package: sprng
> > | Severity: wishlist
> > |
> > | --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> > | Hi Dirk
> > |
> > | it seems there exists a sprng4 (which uses the
> autoconf/automake/libtool)
> > | and in debian only sprng2 is available.
> > | Moreover it seems that sprng has support for MPI, would it be
> possible to
> > | add mpi support ?
> > |
> > | Unfortunately sprng has not been updated wrt recent version of g++
> (4.3
> > | and 4.4)
> >
> > sprng is, politely speaking, a mess.
> >
> > I forced my way around sprng2 with some help from others (to make it
> create
> > a shared library) as I needed a distributed random number generator
> for use
> > by R with the snow (r-cran-snow) framework for distributed
> computing. I
> > never used sprng as a library.
> >
> > I am aware that there are newer versions, and I have at times tried,
> and
> > failed, to package them. Would you like to tackle this jointly?
> >
> > Otherwise, from R's side there is another parallel rng provided by
> > http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rlecuyer/index.html
> >
> > Pierre L'Ecuyer is quite well known for RNG work, maybe his code
> would
> > suitable for a general purpose library too ? I have been thinking
> about
> > packaging this and the retiring r-cran-rsprng and the sprng package.
> >
> > Thought or comments?
> >
> > Dirk
> >
> > | Best regards
> > | C.
> > |
> > | --- System information. ---
> > | Architecture: amd64
> > | Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-amd64
> > |
> > | Debian Release: squeeze/sid
> > | 500 unstable ftp.fr.debian.org
> > | 500 stable volatile.debian.org
> > | 500 stable security.debian.org
> > | 500 stable ftp.fr.debian.org
> > |
> > | --- Package information. ---
> > | Package's Depends field is empty.
> > |
> > | Package's Recommends field is empty.
> > |
> > | Package's Suggests field is empty.
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to