-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hi Till and others,

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Please merge the following Ubuntu package version of Ghostscript into  
> Debian:

> - pstoraster did not work when called with an input file name as the 6th
>   command line argument.
>
> - The "ps2write" output device produces PostScript which is not
>   DSC-conforming, so do not advertize it as DSC-conforming with a
>   "%!PS-Adobe-..." magic string. Use "%!" instead. Otherwise the
>   "pstops" CUPS filter cannot handle this output
>   (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377011).
>
> - Fixed recognition of page size via /cupsPageSizeName in the "cups"
>   output device. All page sizes were considered custom sizes if
>   /cupsPageSizeName was not set.

Above is in Git already (cherry-picked from upstream yesterday).


> - Splitted off the CUPS-related files into its own package, so that the
>   requirements of cups and cups-client for the automatic update of the
>   PPDs of existing print queues do not apply to the ghostscript core
>   package. Added cups and cups-client to the Depends: entry of the new
>   ghostscript-cups package, so that the automatic updates of the PPDs
>   also works on updates to a new release of the distribution and not
>   only on single-package updates. Added also perl as dependency to the
>   ghostscript-cups package as it is also needed for the automatic PPD
>   updates.

Sounds interesting.

Is the perl dependency for the defoma code currently in ghostscript 
postinst?  I haven't look closely at it, but is perl-base not 
sufficient?

Could you please post a diff of this one change isolated - preferrably 
against the packaging work in Git?  Or even better just applied directly 
to our Git here: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/ghostscript.git.



> Especially the second and the last change are necessarily needed in  
> Debian, to avoid that the CUPS packages have to be different in Debian  
> and Ubuntu.

I do not consider Ubuntu upstream to Debian.  It makes much better sense 
to me to do coordinated work together on the Debian package.

That said, I appreciate you informing about changes in Ubuntu, I will 
certainly cherry-pick changes that makes sense for Debian (which might 
very well be all of it).

(and I speak only for myself - other maintainers may feel differently)


Kind regards,

  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkoZsEsACgkQn7DbMsAkQLghjQCfRLzJHT5+v4bXGK5YYdY2XDq1
Ql8Anip6to+HQGoc5ZUK4aLDiJeu3J0d
=uTg3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to