On Sunday 31 May 2009 23:28:04 Felipe Sateler wrote: > El lunes 1 de junio, Andres Mejia escribió: > > On Sunday 31 May 2009 22:40:16 Felipe Sateler wrote: > > > El lunes 1 de junio, Andres Mejia escribió: > > > > Forgot to mention this in the last mail. I've also fixed every bug in > > > > the BTS for faad2. > > > > > > > > faad2 will have to pass through the NEW queue again. One thing that > > > > changed is the name of the libfaad shared lib package. It's now named > > > > as libfaad2, since the library installed is libfaad.so.2.0.0. > > > > > > You should coordinate with the release team, so that you don't get faad > > > tangled with some other transition. > > > > This is something we still have to wait for the new faad2 package to be > > accepted and enter testing anyway. > > No. Imagine libA is transitioning. faad is uploaded to unstable. Package B > is built against the new faad. Then libfaad has becomed tangled with the > transition of libA: B cannot transition into testing until libfaad does > too. The transitions are *into* testing.
Could you CC 515...@bugs.debian.org? faad2 is not maintained by the multimedia team yet. Alright then, I'll contact the release team. However, will any DD from the multimedia team upload the new faad2? > > I suppose once the new faad2 is accepted, binNMUs should be requested for > > reverse dependencies. Here's my list of packages depending on libfaad0 > > and libfaad2-0. > > You have to look at the reverse build-dependencies on the -dev package. Is there some program that will show reverse build-dependencies? I can't figure out how to make apt-cache do this. -- Regards, Andres -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
