Thanks again for looking at this.. 2009/6/4 Sebastian Harl <s...@tokkee.org>
> Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:37:51PM +0100, Matthew Exley wrote: > > Now, should I have egg on my face for missing it, or should the > dependencies > > for rrdtool have sorted that out for me? > > > > I note rrdtool only has: > > librrd4 (>= 1.3.0) > > rrdtool does not _require_ a more up-to-date version of librrd4. Understood. (Seems odd to me that they're not in lockstep, but I'm not questioning it) > > (I did "apt-get -u install rrdtool" to upgrade, and that's normally > pretty > > good at pulling in dependencies). > > Do you use pinning or something similar? Letting aside dependencies, the > new version should have been pulled in because of the higher version > number. > I did mention I did a single-package install. I'm sure an "apt-get upgrade" would have dragged it in, but I didn't do that. Your explanation above about not *requiring* an upgrade explains the behaviour adequately, I think. Cheers, -- Matthew Exley hen...@guided-naafi.org
