Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hmm. But initially both were Recommends, maybe you can provide > at least a changelog entry explaining the change?
there were changelog entries refering to bug numbers. there's not much in amending 'history'. > Now it's difficult to parse that. the argument of using extlinux and thus currently being forced to have mtools and dosfstools installed is valid as long as extlinux and syslinux being in the same package. splitting out extlinux doesn't make sense until it's not packaged as being a replacement for grub, that would be micropackaging which we carefully avoid. therefore, not splitting out as of now. > P.S. Dunno if sending to 532857@ makes any sense after you sent > to 532857-d...@. Let's see... unless it's archived, you can still write to closed bugs. archiving happens ~1 month after closing. after that, it has to first be unarchived. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
