Hi,
On Thu, May 28 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.8.1.0
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Based on previous discussion, here are proposed changes to the description
> of the Architecture field to bring it in line with recent changes to
> dpkg-source and to try to make the whole section clearer.
>
> This patch does not address the addition of architecture wildcards.  I'd
> like to take care of this first and then add that patch (and will have
> some separate suggestions for it).
>
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 144cbfb..52e7e24 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -2710,7 +2710,7 @@ Package: libc6
>           values:
>           <list>
>               <item>A unique single word identifying a Debian machine
> -                   architecture, see <ref id="arch-spec">.
> +                   architecture as described in <ref id="arch-spec">.
>               <item><tt>all</tt>, which indicates an
>                     architecture-independent package.
>               <item><tt>any</tt>, which indicates a package available
> @@ -2721,31 +2721,53 @@ Package: libc6
>  
>         <p>
>           In the main <file>debian/control</file> file in the source
> -         package, or in the source package control file
> -         <file>.dsc</file>, one may specify a list of architectures
> -         separated by spaces, or the special values <tt>any</tt> or
> -         <tt>all</tt>.
> +         package, this field may contain the special value
> +         <tt>any</tt>, the special value <tt>all</tt>, or a list of
> +         architectures separated by spaces.  If <tt>any</tt> or
> +         <tt>all</tt> appear, they must be the entire contents of the
> +         field.  Most packages will use either <tt>any</tt> or
> +         <tt>all</tt>.  Specifying a specific list of architectures is
> +         for the minority of cases where a program is not portable or
> +         is not useful on some architectures, and where possible the
> +         program should be made portable instead.
> +       </p>
> +
> +       <p>
> +         In the source package control file <file>.dsc</file>, this
> +         field may contain either the special value <tt>any</tt> or a
> +         list of architectures separated by spaces. If a list is given,
> +         it may include (or consist solely of) the special value
> +         <tt>all</tt>.  In other words, in <file>.dsc</file> files
> +         unlike the <file>debian/control</file>, <tt>all</tt> may occur
> +         in combination with specific architectures.  The
> +         <tt>Architecture</tt> field in the source package control file
> +         <file>.dsc</file> is generally constructed from the
> +         <tt>Architecture</tt> fields in the
> +         <file>debian/control</file> in the source package.
>         </p>
>  
>         <p>
>           Specifying <tt>any</tt> indicates that the source package
>           isn't dependent on any particular architecture and should
>           compile fine on any one. The produced binary package(s)
> -         will be specific to whatever the current build architecture
> -         is.<footnote>
> -             This is the most often used setting, and is recommended
> -             for new packages that aren't <tt>Architecture: all</tt>.
> -         </footnote>
> +         will either be specific to whatever the current build
> +         architecture is or will be architecture-independent.
> +       </p>
> +
> +       <p>
> +         Specifying only <tt>all</tt> indicates that the source package
> +         will only build architecture-independent packages.  If this is
> +         the case, <tt>all</tt> must be used rather than <tt>any</tt>;
> +         <tt>any</tt> implies that the source package will build at
> +         least one architecture-dependent package.
>         </p>
>  
>         <p>
>           Specifying a list of architectures indicates that the source
>           will build an architecture-dependent package, and will only
> -         work correctly on the listed architectures.<footnote>
> -             This is a setting used for a minority of cases where the
> -             program is not portable. Generally, it should not be used
> -             for new packages.
> -         </footnote>
> +         work correctly on the listed architectures.  If the source
> +         package also builds at least one architecture-independent
> +         package, <tt>all</tt> will also be included in the list.
>         </p>
>  
>         <p>
> @@ -2753,7 +2775,11 @@ Package: libc6
>           field lists the architecture(s) of the package(s)
>           currently being uploaded.  This will be a list; if the
>           source for the package is also being uploaded, the special
> -         entry <tt>source</tt> is also present.
> +         entry <tt>source</tt> is also present.  <tt>all</tt> will be
> +         present if any architecture-independent packages are being
> +         uploaded.  <tt>any</tt> may never occur in the
> +         <tt>Architecture</tt> field in the <file>.changes</file>
> +         file.
>         </p>
>  
>         <p>

        Seconded.

        manoj
-- 
People with narrow minds usually have broad tongues.
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to