On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 21:05 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:07:04PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > owner 382725 ! > > tag 382725 confirmed > > thanks > > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 11:47:06PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Package: python-apt > > > Version: 0.6.16.1bpo1 > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > python-apt does not wrap the pkgPolicy class. This seems to make it > > > impossible to select versions to install based on the normal pinning > > > configuration *and* other criteria. > > I don't think that this is really needed, but I'll see what I can do > > for 0.8. > Packages are available for source, amd64, i386 at: > deb http://people.debian.org/~jak/debian/ experimental/ > deb-src http://people.debian.org/~jak/debian/ experimental/ > > These packages are snapshots of the 0.7.92 development, and provide the > class apt_pkg.Policy. But as I already said, it is not really useful, > because DepCache itself provides access to read_pinfile() for it's > policy. This means you can use DepCache for normal cases, but for more > specific stuff, you can use Policy.
Thanks. Now I need to remember what I wanted this for! (I have a rough idea.) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part