On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 21:05 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:07:04PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > owner 382725 !
> > tag 382725 confirmed
> > thanks
> > 
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 11:47:06PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Package: python-apt
> > > Version: 0.6.16.1bpo1
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > 
> > > python-apt does not wrap the pkgPolicy class.  This seems to make it
> > > impossible to select versions to install based on the normal pinning
> > > configuration *and* other criteria.
> > I don't think that this is really needed, but I'll see what I can do
> > for 0.8.
> Packages are available for source, amd64, i386 at:
>     deb http://people.debian.org/~jak/debian/ experimental/
>     deb-src http://people.debian.org/~jak/debian/ experimental/
> 
> These packages are snapshots of the 0.7.92 development, and provide the
> class apt_pkg.Policy. But as I already said, it is not really useful,
> because DepCache itself provides access to read_pinfile() for it's
> policy. This means you can use DepCache for normal cases, but for more
> specific stuff, you can use Policy.

Thanks.  Now I need to remember what I wanted this for!  (I have a rough
idea.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Never attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by stupidity.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to